Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1363
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurana, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-24T11:59:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-24T11:59:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-24-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1363-
dc.description.abstractA set of mid-rise bare and uniformly infilled reinforced-concrete frame buildings are analyzed for two different seismic intensities of ground-motions (i.e., „Design Basis Earthquake‟ and „Maximum Considered Earthquake‟) to study their floor response. The crucial parameters affecting seismic design force for acceleration-sensitive non-structural components are studied and compared with the guidelines of the European and the United States standards, and also with the recently developed NIST provisions. It is observed that the provisions of both the European and the United States standards do not account for the effects of the period of vibration of the supporting structure and seismic intensity of ground-motions and thereby provides conservative estimates of the in-structure amplification. In case of bare frames, the herein derived component amplification factors for both the design basis earthquake and the maximum considered earthquake exceeds with their recommended values in the European and the United States standards for non-structural components having periods in vicinity of the higher modes of vibration, whereas, in case of infilled frames, component amplification factors exceeds with their recommended value in the European standard for non-structural components having periods in vicinity of the fundamental mode of vibration, and only for the design basis earthquake. As a consequence of these observations, as well as capping on the design force (in case of United states standard and NIST provisions), in case of the design basis earthquake, the combined amplification factor is underestimated for non-structural components having periods in vicinity of the higher modes of vibration of bare frames, and also for nonstructural components having periods in vicinity of the fundamental mode of vibration of infilled frames. At the maximum considered earthquake demand, excepting non-structural components having periods in vicinity of the higher modes of vibration of bare frames, all provisions generally provide conservative estimates of the design floor accelerations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectRC frame buildingsen_US
dc.subjectSeismic designen_US
dc.subjectNon-structural componentsen_US
dc.subjectComponent amplificationen_US
dc.subjectIn-structure amplificationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of seismic design provisions for acceleration-sensitive non-structural componentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Year-2019

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Full Text.pdf2.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.