Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1929
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJati, A.
dc.contributor.authorGupta, N.
dc.contributor.authorChattopadhyay, A.
dc.contributor.authorSanadhya, S. K.
dc.contributor.authorChang, D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T18:37:50Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T18:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1929
dc.description.abstractThreshold Implementation (TI) is one of the most widely used countermeasure for side channel attacks. Over the years several TI techniques have been proposed for randomizing cipher execution using different variations of secret-sharing and implementation techniques. For instance, sharing without decomposition (4-shares) is the most straightforward implementation of the threshold countermeasure. However, its usage is limited due to its high area requirements. On the other hand, sharing using decomposition (3-shares) countermeasure for cubic non-linear functions significantly reduces area and complexity in comparison to 4-shares. Nowadays, security of ciphers using a side channel countermeasure is of utmost importance. This is due to the wide range of security critical applications from smart cards, battery operated IoT devices, to accelerated crypto-processors. Such applications have different requirements (higher speed, energy efficiency, low latency, small area etc.) and hence need different implementation techniques. Although, many TI strategies and implementation techniques are known for different ciphers, there is no single study comparing these on a single cipher. Such a study would allow a fair comparison of the various methodologies. In this work, we present an in-depth analysis of the various ways in which TI can be implemented for a lightweight cipher. We chose GIFT for our analysis as it is currently one of the most energy-efficient lightweight ciphers. The experimental results show that different implementation techniques have distinct applications. For example, the 4-shares technique is good for applications demanding high throughput whereas 3-shares is suitable for constrained environments with less area and moderate throughput requirements. The techniques presented in the paper are also applicable to other blockciphers. For security evaluation, we performed TVLA (test vector leakage assessment) on all the design strategies. Experiments using up to 50 million traces show that the designs are protected against first-order attacksen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSide-channel attacken_US
dc.subjectthreshold implementationen_US
dc.subjectDPAen_US
dc.subjectCPAen_US
dc.subjectGIFTen_US
dc.subjectTIen_US
dc.subjectlightweight cryptographyen_US
dc.subjectTVLAen_US
dc.titleThreshold implementations of GIFT: A Trade-Off analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Year-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.