Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2320
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, R.-
dc.contributor.authorTiwari, A. K.-
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, D.-
dc.contributor.authorMain, R. P.-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, N.-
dc.contributor.authorSihota, P.-
dc.contributor.authorAmbwani, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, N. N.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T04:13:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-02T04:13:18Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2320-
dc.description.abstractCortical bone surfaces (periosteal and endosteal) exhibit differential (re)modelling response to mechanical loading. This poses a serious challenge in establishing an in silico model to predict site-specific new bone formation as a function of mechanical stimulus. In this regard, mechanical loading-induced fluid motion in lacunarcanalicular system (LCS) is assumed osteogenic. Micro-architectural properties, especially permeability regulate canalicular fluid motion within the bone. The knowledge of these properties is required to compute flow distribution. Along the same line, it is possible that cortical surfaces may experience differential fluid distribution due to anatomical variations in microarchitectural properties which may induce distinct new bone response at cortical surfaces. Nevertheless, these properties are not well reported for cortical surfaces in the literature. Accordingly, the present study aims to measure microarchitectural properties especially permeability at different anatomical locations (medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior) of periosteal and endosteal surfaces using nanoindentation. A standard poroelastic optimization technique was used to estimate permeability, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio. The properties are also compared for two weight-bearing bones i.e. tibia and femur. Endosteal surface was found more permeable as compared to the periosteal surface. Tibial endosteal surface had shown greater permeability values at most of the anatomical locations as compared to femoral endosteal surface. The outcomes may be used to precisely predict site-specific osteogenesis in cortical bone as a function of canalicular flow distribution. This work may ultimately be beneficial in designing the loading parameters to stimulate desired new bone response for the prevention and the cure of bone loss.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBone adaptationen_US
dc.subjectLacunar-canalicular system (LCS)en_US
dc.subjectPermeabilityen_US
dc.subjectNanoindentationen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.titleAnatomical variations in cortical bone surface permeability: tibia versus femuren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Year-2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Full Text.pdf7.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.