Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, N-
dc.contributor.authorAirao, J-
dc.contributor.authorMaheshwari, P-
dc.contributor.authorNirala, C K.-
dc.contributor.authorOuteiro, J-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T13:32:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-11T13:32:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4598-
dc.description.abstractAbstract This work emphasizes life cycle assessment (LCA) for conventional and ultrasonic assisted turning (UAT) of Inconel 718 under six different combinations of cooling/lubricant strategies (LCO2, MQL, and EMQL). The results indicate that when LCO2 is flown on the rake whereas EMQL on the flank face, the tool wear, surface roughness, and energy consumption are significantly reduced compared to other strategies. The surface roughness is lowered approximately by 3–43% in the UAT compared to CT. The LCA results show that the combination of EMQL-MQL has more impact on the environment as it had a separate setup for charging the mist particles by a high voltage, followed by LCO2-EMQL and LCO2-MQL technique. The major impact is on the Ecosystem by 76.2%, 74.2%, and 75.3% in LCO2-EMQL, EMQL-MQL, and LCO2-MQL. It is concluded that LCO2-EMQL is the best strategy for creating a balance between both technical and environmental parameters.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectInconel 718en_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic- assisted turningen_US
dc.subjectLCO2en_US
dc.subjectMQLen_US
dc.subjectEMQLen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.titleLife cycle assessment to reduce environmental and carbon footprints of ultrasonic-assisted turningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Year-2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Full Text.pdf9.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.