INSTITUTIONAL DIGITAL REPOSITORY

Robustness of early warning signals for catastrophic and non-catastrophic transitions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dutta, P.S.
dc.contributor.author Sharma, Y.
dc.contributor.author Abbott, K.C.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-28T10:58:56Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-28T10:58:56Z
dc.date.issued 2018-12-28
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1118
dc.description.abstract Early warning signals (EWS) are statistical indicators that a rapid regime shift may be forthcoming. Their development has given ecologists hope of predicting rapid regime shifts before they occur. Accurate predictions, however, rely on the signals being appropriate to the system in question. Most of the EWS commonly applied in ecology have been studied in the context of one specific type of regime shift (the type brought on by a saddle-node bifurcation, at which one stable equilibrium point collides with an unstable equilibrium and disappears) under one particular perturbation scheme (temporally uncorrelated noise that perturbs the net population growth rate in a density independent way). Whether and when these EWS can be applied to other ecological situations remains relatively unknown, and certainly underappreciated. We study a range of models with different types of dynamical transitions (including rapid regime shifts) and several perturbation schemes (density-dependent uncorrelated or temporally-correlated noise) and test the ability of EWS to warn of an approaching transition. We also test the sensitivity of our results to the amount of available pre-transition data and various decisions that must be made in the analysis (i.e. the rolling window size and smoothing bandwidth used to compute the EWS). We find that EWS generally work well to signal an impending saddle-node bifurcation, regardless of the autocorrelation or intensity of the noise. However, EWS do not reliably appear as expected for other types of transition. EWS were often very sensitive to the length of the pre-transition time series analyzed, and usually less sensitive to other decisions. We conclude that the EWS perform well for saddle-node bifurcation in a range of noise environments, but different methods should be used to predict other types of regime shifts. As a consequence, knowledge of the mechanism behind a possible regime shift is needed before EWS can be used to predict it.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Regime shifts en_US
dc.subject Critical transitions en_US
dc.subject Early warning signals en_US
dc.subject Alternative stable states en_US
dc.subject Stochasticity en_US
dc.subject Colored noise en_US
dc.title Robustness of early warning signals for catastrophic and non-catastrophic transitions en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account