dc.contributor.author | Henning, M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pandey, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-02T15:34:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-02T15:34:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-02 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1201 | |
dc.description.abstract | For a graph G = (V, E), a set D ⊆ V is called a semitotal dominating set of G if D is a dominating set of G, and every vertex in D is within distance 2 of another vertex of D. The Minimum Semitotal Domination problem is to find a semitotal dominating set of minimum cardinality. Given a graph G and a positive integer k, the Semitotal Domination Decision problem is to decide whether G has a semitotal dominating set of cardinality at most k. The Semitotal Domination Decision problem is known to be NP-complete for general graphs. In this paper, we show that the Semitotal Domination Decision problem remains NP-complete for planar graphs, split graphs and chordal bipartite graphs. We give a polynomial time algorithm to solve the Minimum Semitotal Domination problem in interval graphs. We show that the Minimum Semitotal Domination problem in a graph with maximum degree ∆ admits an approximation algorithm that achieves the approximation ratio of 2 + 3 ln(∆ + 1), showing that the problem is in the class log-APX. We also show that the Minimum Semitotal Domination problem cannot be approximated within (1 − ǫ) ln |V | for any ǫ > 0 unless NP ⊆ DTIME (|V | O(log log |V |) ). Finally, we prove that the Minimum Semitotal Domination problem is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 4. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Domination | en_US |
dc.subject | Semitotal domination | en_US |
dc.subject | Bipartite graphs | en_US |
dc.subject | Chordal graphs | en_US |
dc.subject | Interval graphs | en_US |
dc.subject | Graph algorithm | en_US |
dc.subject | NP-complete | en_US |
dc.subject | Approximation algorithm | en_US |
dc.subject | APX-complete | en_US |
dc.title | Algorithmic aspects of semitotal domination in graphs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |