Abstract:
The growth of crowdsourced knowledge-building portals such as Wikipedia, Quora, and
Stack Exchange has been explosive in recent years, as evidenced by the enormous amounts
of knowledge the portals currently possess. Wikipedia houses 6 million articles and Stack
Overflow (one of the websites in the Stack Exchange network) has 18 million questions. It
is interesting to observe that it is the crowd, and not the experts, that builds the knowledge
on these knowledge-building portals. The crowd is responsible for the collaborative editing
of Wikipedia articles, and on Stack Overflow, the crowd not only asks the questions but
also answers them. However, the aforementioned knowledge-building portals employ two
different types of collaborative knowledge-building practices. Wikipedia is a knowledge archival
portal, it builds knowledge in the form of articles. On the other hand, Stack Overflow is a
discussion forum that builds knowledge in the form of questions and answers. As collaborative
knowledge-building practices, the knowledge archival on a wiki portal and the discussions on
the QnA forum function independently of each other. Inspired by the success of both the types
of knowledge-building practices (i.e. knowledge archival and discussion), we propose a union
of the two sets of knowledge-building practices. In this thesis, we introduce QWiki, a novel
approach to collaborative knowledge building that integrates a wiki portal and a QnA forum.
The models and parameters proposed in the thesis establish the importance of the interaction of
a wiki portal with a QnA forum and vice-versa. The integration of the QnA forum and the wiki
portal results in a mutually-beneficial relationship in which the two knowledge-building portals
address the limitations in one another. The readability of the knowledge present in portals such as
Wikipedia is low, because of which users often fail to comprehend the information given in the
articles. On the other hand, the knowledge in QnA forums such as Stack Exchange is scattered
across the various discussion posts because of which it becomes difficult for the user to identify,
comprehend or revisit the relevant information. The QWiki portal allows users to ask questions if
they are unable to comprehend the information in a wiki article. It also enables the organization
and archival of the information scattered across a QnA forum. Thus, an integration of the QnA
forum and the wiki portal benefits and promotes knowledge-building in portals of both the types.
The experimental analysis in this thesis demonstrates that QWiki contributes to the processes of
knowledge acquisition and knowledge-building. Wikipedia has its own discussion environment
called talk pages. In the thesis, we also present a detailed comparative analysis of the discussion
environments in QWiki and Wikipedia i.e., the QnA forums and the talk pages. Further, an
application of QWiki in an online learning environment is also discussed in detail.