INSTITUTIONAL DIGITAL REPOSITORY

Life cycle assessment to reduce environmental and carbon footprints of ultrasonic-assisted turning

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khanna, N
dc.contributor.author Airao, J
dc.contributor.author Maheshwari, P
dc.contributor.author Nirala, C K.
dc.contributor.author Outeiro, J
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-11T13:32:11Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-11T13:32:11Z
dc.date.issued 2024-06-11
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.iitrpr.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4598
dc.description.abstract Abstract This work emphasizes life cycle assessment (LCA) for conventional and ultrasonic assisted turning (UAT) of Inconel 718 under six different combinations of cooling/lubricant strategies (LCO2, MQL, and EMQL). The results indicate that when LCO2 is flown on the rake whereas EMQL on the flank face, the tool wear, surface roughness, and energy consumption are significantly reduced compared to other strategies. The surface roughness is lowered approximately by 3–43% in the UAT compared to CT. The LCA results show that the combination of EMQL-MQL has more impact on the environment as it had a separate setup for charging the mist particles by a high voltage, followed by LCO2-EMQL and LCO2-MQL technique. The major impact is on the Ecosystem by 76.2%, 74.2%, and 75.3% in LCO2-EMQL, EMQL-MQL, and LCO2-MQL. It is concluded that LCO2-EMQL is the best strategy for creating a balance between both technical and environmental parameters. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Inconel 718 en_US
dc.subject Ultrasonic- assisted turning en_US
dc.subject LCO2 en_US
dc.subject MQL en_US
dc.subject EMQL en_US
dc.subject Life cycle assessment en_US
dc.title Life cycle assessment to reduce environmental and carbon footprints of ultrasonic-assisted turning en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account