dc.description.abstract |
Since the introduction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), a non
invasive technique for mapping the brain activity, there has been an exponential growth
in the brain mapping studies. Recently, multi-center fMRI studies have become more
prevalent as they help accumulate significant number of subjects to increase the statis
tical power of data analyses. However, the seemingly ambitious gain is hindered by the
fact that diversity in acquisition and analysis methods of different centers has significant
effect on the imaging results. Inspired by the use of correction functions in the domain
of structural MRI, current work proposes the use of machine learning techniques to esti
mate mapping functions to normalize the activation parameters observed at a particular
site to a chosen reference site. Unlike previous studies that focused on normalizing acti
vation related parameters such as signal-to-fluctuation noise ratio (SFNR), smoothness,
etc., the main contribution of this work is to enhance the comparability of activation
patterns across sites.
This research work explores the use of (a) Linear regression with robust statistics,
(b) Machine learning based non-linear regression and (c) Transfer learning algorithms
to reduce the inter-scanner variability of activation. Additionally, a threshold adjust
ment approach based on theoretical relationship between acquisition and image quality
parameters is also investigated. Extensive experiments conducted using the FBIRN
Phase 1 Traveling Subjects dataset (specifically designed to help assess test-retest and
between-site reliability) demonstrate the potential of machine learning based algorithms
to generate correction functions. Both quantitative and qualitative results indicate sig
nificant reduction in spurious activations and more importantly, enhancement of the
genuine activation clusters. Group level ROI based analysis reveals changes in activa
tion pattern of clusters that are consistent with their role in cognitive function. Further more, as the mapping functions exhibit the tendency to induce sensitivity to the regions
associated with the task they can help identify small but significant activations which
could otherwise be lost due to population based inferences across centers. |
en_US |